|
Draft proposed at Senate on October 5th, 2004 includes WOMEN !
|
Blog For Free!
Archives
Home
2004 December
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July
My Links
Homepage
Write it right
tblog.com
Mavens' Word
edward jayepstein
jp-petit.com
so cute devil doll !
wisdomquotes
Ironblogrlgn's Blog
Blog Search Engine
therealspartacus
eyleen's blog
drforbush's blog
jomama's blog
whoisjohngalt's blog
WinstonSmith's blog
spymaster's blog
whynot's blog
samadams's blog
tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images
Sponsored
Blog
|
| Draft proposed at Senate on October 5th, 2004 includes WOMEN ! |
| 10.29.04 (11:30 am) [edit] |
From
optruth.org/main.cfm?actionId=globalShowSt aticContent&screenKey=dra ft&lnav=1
http://www.optruth.org/main.cfm?actionId=globalShowSt aticContent&screenKey=dra ft&lnav=1" title="http://www.optruth.org/main.cfm?actionId=globalShowSt aticContent&screenKey=dra ft&lnav=1" target="_blank"http://www.optruth.org/main.c...
"On October 5th, 2004, with no debate and on only hours notice, the House of Representatives voted on a bill that would have reinstated the draft. The proposal was overwhelmingly rejected. Why was it voted on at all? This vote was a political maneuver, intended to put this controversial question to rest before the election."
...
"What are the details of the draft proposal rejected by Congress?
Would it be like the draft during the war in Vietnam?
Titled the “Universal National Service Act of 2003,” this proposal was set forth by Representative Charles Rangel (D-NY) and would require that “all American men and women, as well legal permanent residents, aged 18 to 26, would be subject to compulsory military service or alternative civilian service.”"
|
|
|
| |
|
Newcomers, forgive my loose english - it's not my native language !
Book(s) I referred or will refer to in my posts:
|
